Investigating the MASS SHOOTING and SSRI Psychotropic-Drug CONNECTION

Could the “behavioral sink” observed in captive animals explain human fertility decline and mass shootings? In a world where antidepressants are prescribed to millions and mass shootings are tragically routine, researchers and lawmakers are increasingly questioning whether the modern environment—and the drugs meant to treat its stresses—are driving society toward dysfunction.

The parallels between animal experiments in confinement and human behavior under modern living conditions suggest a troubling pattern. Now, Tennessee has become the first U.S. state to mandate toxicology testing on mass shooters, probing whether psychiatric medications play a role in violent outbursts.

1. SSRIs and Violence Link: Prescription antidepressants (SSRIs) are increasingly scrutinized as a potential factor in mass shootings, with data suggesting they may contribute to violent outbursts, suicide, and homicide. Many mass shooters were documented to be on SSRIs, sparking calls for “prescription drug control” over gun restrictions.
2. “Behavioral Sink” Hypothesis: Researchers draw parallels between human dysfunction (declining fertility, social withdrawal, and violence) and animal experiments showing abnormal behavior in confined environments. Critics argue modern alienation and overmedication mirror these toxic conditions.
3. Tennessee’s Landmark Law: Tennessee became the first state to mandate toxicology testing of mass shooters for psychiatric drugs (HB1349/SB1146), driven by advocates demanding transparency. Opponents argue the law infringes on perpetrators’ rights, while supporters insist the public deserves to know if SSRIs played a role.
4. Overmedication Crisis: Widespread SSRI use (e.g., 25% of Scottish adults) coincides with rising mental health issues, despite studies showing minimal benefits over placebos. Critics question whether these drugs mask deeper societal problems and call for natural remedies over Big Pharma solutions.

The “Behavioral Sink” Hypothesis

The concept of a “behavioral sink”—where animals, when confined in artificial environments, exhibit abnormal behavior—has long been studied. A famous 1960s experiment with mice in an overcrowded utopia saw population collapse, social withdrawal, and bizarrely passive behaviors, such as excessive grooming instead of mating. Similar observations have been made with captive primates, who engage in unnatural actions like compulsive masturbation. Some theorists argue that humans, living in what critic Bronze Age Pervert calls an “iron prison” of alienation and dependency, are mirroring these behaviors—losing interest in reproduction and even turning to violence.

The Antidepressant Debate

The possible link between antidepressants and mass shootings has been a source of controversy for decades. Since the Columbine High School massacre in 1999—when one shooter was found to be taking the antidepressant Luvox—questions have lingered about psychiatric drugs’ role in violence.

Data supports the concern: a large 2020 Swedish study linked selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) to increased violent crime among young adults, and U.S. FDA reports consistently associate SSRIs with aggressive behavior. Yet, pharmaceutical companies and detractors dismiss the connection. In response, Tennessee’s new law (HB1349/SB 1146) will require toxicology reports for mass shooters, revealing whether they were under the influence of psychiatric drugs.

“When someone commits mass murder, the public has a right to know if mind-altering drugs played a role,” said Sheila Matthews of advocacy group AbleChild, which drafted the bill. Critics, however, such as Tennessee State Sen. Lisa Monroe, argue the law infringes on “murderers’ rights”—a claim opponents call absurd.

The issue extends beyond mass violence. In Scotland, 25% of adults take antidepressants, while the U.S. sees rampant overprescription—despite studies suggesting minimal benefits over placebos. Meanwhile, depression and anxiety continue rising, particularly among youth, fueling debate over whether these drugs mask deeper societal problems.

Modern society appears to be breeding conditions of extreme stress and detachment—whether through artificial living, overmedication, or both. As Tennessee’s law paves the way for further scrutiny, the question remains: Have we created an environment so out of sync with human nature that it is destroying us? The answer, if uncovered, could reshape policy, medicine, and even our understanding of what it means to live meaningfully. For now, one thing is clear: The public deserves the full truth—regardless of who profits from silence.

Tune your internet dial to NaturalMedicine.news for more tips on how to use natural remedies for preventative medicine and for healing, instead of succumbing to Big Pharma products like SSRIs that cause people to lose their minds and go on mass shooting sprees, and then usually kill themselves after.

Sources for this article include:

NaturalNews.com

Infowars.com